King cobra 10 feet 4 inches thattu Maenga,Samtlang

King cobra 10 feet 4 inches thattu Maenga,Samtlang .A rawtuai khawrhna ah he rul hian a rawn pan a, alo that a ni.

~ ‎Esther R Fanai | CHANCHINTHAR

The first Remna ni

June 30: 2016

Tuni dak 1:30 pm vel khan The first 'REMNA NI' 

(Theme: "Live at peace with everyone") tia thupi a mangin Chiengkawnpang MPC Sub-Hq. Zone-1 te guong galh na nuoi ah Chiengkawnpang Community Hall ah mat in ana um hi.

 Zie hun ahin Pu Solomon chief of Chiengkawnpang in hun hawn Pauchamna nei in muokna thu genna Pu Dongkholal, President MPC Chiengkawn Unit in anei zawm ngal hi.

Chun 'Remna ni' aki matna ziek Pu Thangpau, President Zone-1 in genlatna aneih zawh in sunna hun minute 1 neih zawm ngal ahi. Chun theme genlat na Elder L.S Gangte, Consultant MPC'n aneih zawh in Mass Prayer in azui ngal hi.

 Thugen na Pu F.P Gangte, Consultant MPC'n anei zawm ngal hi.

Chuleh Tribe Leader hung khawm te apat in thupawimawh leh thu golul tak tak ngaihthak na ana um a, ahungkhawm mipite lungthim asutai mah mah ui.

Tuni a tribe leader muon um tak tak hung khawm haw chuh ...

(1) Kuki inpi

(2) Mizo People Convention 

(3) Paite Tribe Council 

(4) Simte Tribe Council

(5) United Zomi Organization

(6) Vaiphei People Council

(7) Zomi Council te ahiu hi.

Zie haw cheng ban ahin lawi upa chuom chuom te hawn le programme uop pihna ahung anei ua, lawhting taka prog mat zawh in ana um hi.

Zie prog hih mipi vântang huop a kibawl hilo in lawi upa lam deuh te prog matna ahih thu le Huihchim news network te ahun hetsak ui.

Programme bangcheng zawh ahihtawh kitawn in Pu H. Hautinthang, Vice President MPC'n vote of thanks gen in hunkhak Pauchamna Rev. Soikhogin Thangzawm in anei ngal hi.

Ahung khawm lawiupa te chengin Pu H.Dalzamang inmun ah ki ngaihnatna ankuong sawk khawmna nei in programme khak ahi tai.

.....Huihchim....

HISTORY OF CHURACHANDPUR "The Story behind Songpi, Churachandpur and Lamka" kiti article Ginza Vualzong, Admn, Zogam.com in ana sutna chunga ka donbut na anahi.

~🇰🇦 Updates:~

HISTORY OF CHURACHANDPUR

"The Story behind Songpi, Churachandpur and Lamka" kiti article Ginza Vualzong, Admn, Zogam.com in ana sutna chunga ka donbut na anahi. 

--------*****------

In response to Ginza’s article “The Story behind Songpi, Churachandpur and Lamka”.

The article was a well manipulated, twisted wisely and purposely skipping the important facts with the intention to convince the ignorant minds of the general public (of Churachandpur) that the original name of Churachandpur was Lamka.

In the first para of the article he says that- “Lamka and Churachandpur are two different locations..… The real Churachandpur is a Hillock 15 km west of Lamka, which was previously known as Songpi”. His above statement is exactly in conformity with the historical record of the saga of Churachandpur, how and why the name came to be known as Churachandpur from Songpi. His statement also explicitly reflects that Lamka has no place in the history of Churachandpur. He is also true that Churachandpur and Lamka are at different places of location. Now my big question is why in spite of knowing and fully aware of the history, still trying his best to conceal the fact and asserted that the original name of Churachandpur was Lamka. The statement in his article itself is the proof that Lamka is neither the original name nor has any relevance in the origin of the name Churachandpur.

It is a mockery, trying to elucidate the present condition with the assertion of taking inference from the past happening without knowing the exact established linked between the two events is bound to distort the historical facts and likely to mislead the general public.

Due to unavailability of enough resources at hand, I am not in a position to precise the time & year, when the Songpi village was established. However, taking account into few events during those days such as boundary dispute between the Chiefs of Songpi and Singngat, I may not be wrong to assume that the Songpi village was as old as Singngat village. Singngat village was established in 1800s.

Anyway keeping aside the events beyond what I could share, let me begin from the year 1919. By the order of Sir Nicolas Beatson Bell, C.C of Assam, Songpi Sub-Division was established on 16 October 1919, with its Headquarters at Songpi. An ICS officer, B.C Casper, was the first Sub Divisional Officer at Songpi. It was basically the outcome of Kuki Rebellion (1917-1919) that the British felt the need to control the Hills by establishing administrative headquarters. Not a single village was there in the present CCPur town area during those days except few villages viz: Khopibung, Gelmol, Bijang, Teiseng and Songpi at the surrounding area. The boundary of Songpi village was extended till Paldai Lui (near Singngat) in South, Tuila river in South-West, Koite river in the North and Khuga (Tuitha) river in the East. It is clear that the whole area of present ccpur town was under the authority of Songpi Chief. Never imagine that the plain area was something like an unknown Island, belonging to none.

Songpi to Churachandpur: It was in 1921 when the then SDO, B.C Casper, hosted a feast to welcome back the Labour Corps returning from France and on the occasion, the Maharaja Churachand Singh of Manipur was invited as a Guest of Honor. As a sign of remembrance and in honor of the Maharaja Churachand’s visit, the name Songpi Sub Division was changed to Churachandpur Sub Division. Therefore, we are totally wrong to assume that Songpi was renamed as Churachandpur due to Meitei’s mala-fide intention of divide and rule policy, as stated in his article. The simple fact is that the changed was done by the British not by the Meiteis. “On that occasion Songpi was renamed to Churachandpur..” he says. He is very much aware that Songpi was changed to Churachandpur but how come they keep claiming the old name of Churachandpur was Lamka or its original name was Lamka? By the time Songpi was changed to Churachandpur the so called Lamka village was not at all existed. So Lamka can never have a place whenever the history of Churachandpur is cited. They further asserted their claim in citing few instances like changing Mumbai from Bombay, Bengaluru from Bangalore. Don’t they understand that all those changed were made due to their historical alignment? So, the same can be in the case of Churachandpur. If it is supposed to be changed to its old name, it should be Songpi. No denying of the fact.

In 1930 Phungkhothang and Zenhang founded the two villages viz. Hiangtam and Bijang Loubuk. It was not like an Island discovered by some adventurers in old stories or in movies. It was very much within the territorial authority of the Chief of Songpi village. Isn’t it a mockery that in spite of knowing the background detail they still keep asserting that the land was unoccupied, undiscovered and belonging to none but the two mentioned names. In fact the valley part was unoccupied only because it was a malaria infested area and they feel safer of being residing in the hilly side. How can Ginza Vualzong say that “At that time when they established this twin villages there were no other villages nearby…”. If that is the case then can he explain how Zenhang lamka was called Bijang Loubuk? If no villages were nearby where did the Bijang Loubuk come from?? Doesn’t he know that the residents of Zenhang Lamka still cast their vote in the name of Bijang Loubuk? (Electoral Rolls-www.ceomanipur.nic.in) While the villagers of Zenhang Lamka still cast their votes in the name of Bijang Loubuk village how can they manage to challenge that they were the first settlers of the area. This is something I fail to understand but on the other hand I really appreciate their guts.

The underlying intention was to claim that they were the first settlers and the land does not belong to none but them. Initially the occupation of the area by Phungkhothang and Zenhang was not an intention to set up villages but wet rice cultivations, which was also very much encouraged by the British. Thus, the then SDO gave permission to reside and use the land for wet rice cultivation. But later when more household joined Zenhang and Phungkhothang then they began submitting petitions requesting the SDO for recognition of separate villages, this led to a misunderstanding with the Songpi Chief, Pu Hemthong. However, the matter was resolved by the State Darbar in 1942. Some lines may be reproduced for reference as under-

“In view of the large number of villages situated in the reserve I held that it was impossible to fix boundaries for each village and disposed of several of the petitions accordingly. I soon realized however that some sort of settlement would have to be made to deal with claims for Ukok and Lousal. …………….Mata Moltam was allowed to settle in the reserve some five years or so ago to cultivate wet rice until last year. Mr. Duncan’s ordered exempting Mata Moltam from payment of Lousal is therefore cancelled. Other villages who have no rights in the hills are Lingsiphai, Ngathal, Phailen Dala, Hengtam Lamka and Rengkai. All these villages were allowed to settle in the reserve to cultivate wet rice and have neither earned nor been given rights to cultivate in the hills without payment of Lousal. All the villages in the old Haokip reserve boundaries will be allowed wood for their own use i.e. for firewood and for house building purpose. *Lousal will be limited to 8/- per jhum inform all villages concerned (The Haokip Reserve in Churachandpur vide Misc. Case No. 1941-42, Manipur State Form 11-9 (Judicial); Sd/- T.A Sharpe, ICS, P.M S.D (Hill) Dt. 6.05.1942 Manipur).

Mission Compound in Songpi: It was in 1930, the same year when Phungkhothang and Zenhang start settling in the plain area, the NEIG Mission founded it’s Headquarters at Songpi. They occupied the vacant quarters at Songpi after taking due permission from Maharaja Churachand Singh. After the NEIG Mission started their activities by setting up schools and church, the place came to be known as Mission Compound. It is totally wrong to say that Songpi was changed to Mission Compound as Pu Semthong had sold all his land and rights to the NEIG Mission, as stated by Ginza. The money taken by Pu Semthong, the Chief of Songpi was only for a piece of land where the Mission established school and church. It is also totally wrong to depict that he sold his village to the Mission. Whenever a Missionary established its headquarters somewhere, we call the place a Mission Compound. To cite a few, when the NEIG Mission Headquarters was in Lakhimpur the place was called Lakhimpur Mission Compound. The American Baptist established its Headquarters in Kangpokpi and came to be known as Kangpokpi Mission Compound. Can you say that Lakhimpur was changed to Mission Compound and Kangpokpi too?? If so, you are totally wrong. Citing the most recent one, the EOC Mission set up its headquarters or secretariat at Hebron Veng in D. Phailen and later this place came to be known as Compound Veng to the locals. Can you say that Compound Veng was not in D. Phailen or D. Phailen is changed to Compound Veng? It is a hidden agenda with a political motive to deliberately avoid using Songpi or to acknowledge the land of Songpi. The Mission Compound in Songpi was not at all a different village but under the Songpi Chief.

In 1933 the Manipur hill administration was re-organized. Circle office was opened again at Churachandpur in 1945. Shri Pearson and Thangkhopao Kipgen inspected the place for its headquarters. The old headquarters, Songpi, being already occupied by NEIG Mission and thinking it more convenient and economical to occupy the abandoned quarters of the British army during World War II at Hill Town, they shifted the headquarter to Hill Town. Thangkhopao Kipgen was the first Circle Officer (C.O) of the new Churachandpur. It was not due to the poor condition of the Songpi Headquarter as stated by Ginza but just because it was occupied by the NEIG Mission. And the new Headquarters, Churachandpur, was not in Lamka rather it was in Hill Town. At any point of time, Hill Town never came under the Chieftainship of Phungkhothang or Zenhang (the so called chief of Lamka) but having a separate Chief, Pu Dongjakai Gangte. So, one will be totally wrong to say that the new headquarters was shifted to Lamka. Instead the headquarters was shifted to Tuibong not Lamka. Tuibong is again under a separate chief, which was never under the chief Zenhang or Phungkhothang. In other words, Hill Town and Tuibong were never part of Lamka. So in the history of Churachandpur, Lamka never occupied a significant position. In his article he wrote how Lamka became the District Headquarters. I wonder when Lamka was the Headquarter of Churachandpur. Did he call Hill Town and Tuibong as Lamka? If so I will be much appreciated if he can explain to us when Hill Town and Tuibong chiefs sold their village to Lamka village.

The popularity of Lamka village is due to the fact that it is the central part of Churachandpur town, a business hub and its population and market expand rapidly. Taking political advantages out of this situation, knowingly or unknowingly, some began to claim villages like Sielmat, Bijang, Rengkai, Hill Town, D. Phailen, Bungmual, Tuibong etc. as once part of Lamka. But the fact is that they were never part of Lamka at any point of time.

To sum up, it is wrong to say that Churachandpur Headquarters was shifted to Lamka. It was not Lamka but to Hill Town and later to Tuibong, both were never part of Lamka. So it will be wise to stop asserting on the wrong side of history and be rather acknowledged what is Lamka and what is not. Bangalore was changed to Bengaluru, Bombay to Mumbai. It was done only due to its certain historical attachment. In case we fail to link with the historical attachment it is more rational to take the name of its headquarters like Senapati, Chandel and Ukhrul. Some cited that Lamka is more popular than any other villages in Churachandpur. Ok that’s true, I agree. But Dimapur is much popular than Kohima, the state capital of Nagaland; Guwahati is much popular than Dispur the state capital of Assam. Did anybody say that all these names should be changed because of its popularity sake? Can any of you enlighten me that the name of any city or place in India is changed only for its popularity sake? All the changed made so far were done on account of its historical attachment. And in Churachandpur context the historical attachment is only to Songpi, and at present condition it is with Tuibong. So, if any attempt is made to change the existing name it will be wiser and more logical to re-name it as Songpi District.

Dated: Mandalay, 31st March 2015.

Reference:

1. "A brief History of Churachandpur" (a Magazine published by DRDA, Churachandpur-2008) by Dongzakai Gangte, Chief of Hill Town.

2. "Suongpi Tlaitlanah" by L. Keivom, IFS Retd.

3. "Zoram Khawvel-2 (1993) by L. Keivom, IFS Retd.

4. The Haokip Reserve in Churachandpur Vide Misc. Case No. 1941-42. Sd/ TA Sharpe, ICS

5. Judgement on "State of Manipur V/s Sokhojam Haokip", High Court of Guwahati, 24 Aug 2011.

⚫

Khochungte Awgin

DISTRICT TOPPER AWARD DAWNG

Lamka, June 15: Churachandpur District Private Schools' Association ten June 14, 2016 ni ah Salt Brook School Auditorium, Tuibuong ah HSSLC & HSLC Examination 2016 ah Churachandpur District Topper Award hawpdawna anei hun un Chawnglemmawi Khaute, Dawn school d/o Mr.Kamlalmuan Khaute & Mrs. Ngaineihat chu HSLC(BSEM) ah District Topper Award piakin aum hi. Ama hin HSLC exam 2016 ah aggregate in 89% (Total Mark = 534) ala mu ahi.

.

Photo: Lalboi Samte @ZogamOnline

HIATSAKNA

ZILLAI HQ in tukum 2016 ah class X, XII zo thak/lawtinna chang te ding ah FELICITATION PROGRAMME sai ding a hia, Zillai Churachandpur Block huap sung ah um Zillai member tukum ah Class X & XII zo thak, 60% apat a chunglam ah lawtinna chang ten June 25, 2016 tiang ah details hun pelut ding in ka hun hiatsak in, ka hun chial hi.

Detail pawimaw te:

1. Marksheet Xerox
2. Admit Card Xerox 
3. Veng min/umna mun
4. School min
5. La percent mu zat
6. Subject ah mark tampen la muna te

Piaklut theina ding te:

1. Mr. GK Suantak,
Secy. Edn., Zillai HQ
email: gksuantak@mail.com
2. Miss. Doisiammoi,
Asst. Secy. Edn., Zillai HQ
email: doisiammoi@gmail.com
3. Mr. Kamneu,
Asst. Secy. Edn., Zillai HQ
email: kamneukhongsai@gmail.com

sd/-

Khailalpiak Vaiphei
Secretary (Edn.)
Zillai Churachandpur Block
Phone: +919862239567

Inamsunguva LIEUTENANT muthah khangthah ni ineibe kit tauve

::PACHANNA CHUNGA KIPA THUPHUON:

Inamsunguva LIEUTENANT muthah khangthah ni ineibe kit tauve.

Brief Details:

1. Lt. Neikholam @Neneu Kipgen

Age: 26 Yrs.

D/O Janglhun & Lhingvah Kipgen

Add: Leikot, Sadar Hills

2. Lt. Lamneineng @Rachel Gangte

Age: 24 Yrs.

D/O Mr&Mrs Lamkholal Gangte

Add: Old Lambulane

Inamsung uva Pathen lungsetna jalla lolhing le pachang ihung kibe jing utoh lhon in tunin jong Insung, Khosung, chule Namsunga dinga kipapi le kineppi thei umtah nungah ni in Army Nursing School a lolhinna ahin neihon toh lhon in tuni chun COMMAND HOSPITAL, Bangalore mun ah COMMISSIONING & OATH TAKING CEREMONY ana neipeh uvin ahi.

Chule *LIEUTENANT* batch behpeh anahi lhon toh kilhonin North East India gamsunga munkhat pen a service din Appoinment amu lhon in ahi. Kipapi aumna chungchon a gah kiletsah pi kit thei khat chu Neneo Kipgen in *Best Clinical PNS Command Hospital Airforce Award* jong asan ahi.

Tahsa mel a kum chapang cha hihon jongle Officer dinmun ahinmu hon hi khangthah te dinga kitilkhouna theitah ahi. Hiche amani Commissioning Ceremony a chun Rev. Lienmang Kipgen jaunan insungmi phabep in vetlom tah in akin chu ana jau peh uve.

- PK Gou

Sunsilk Mega Miss NorthEast 2016 kitetnan eimi Kuki -Vaiphei Chanu nungak melhoitak Nk Nian Vaiphei le pang

Vote pe siausiau hitiu!!!

Sunsilk Mega Miss NorthEast 2016 ah ei Zosuan te lak a pangpha umsun Nk Nian Vaiphei (Miss Zillai Platinum 2014) a dingin vote chiat hitiu. Sms vote mutam pen te chu top 20 lut ngal ding a hiu. A tam thei pen vote in lawi leh paite le hilsawn hitiu.

https://khochungteawgin.blogspot.in/2016/06/sunsilk-mega-miss-northeast-2016.html

Sms a Vote ding ahia, Vote thei hun sung 9 -19 June 2016 1:00 pm. Chan ding ahi. Vote sa ten le vel vote kit thei ahi.

Vote ding dan🏻

To vote type MEGAMiss 25 and send it to 54646

Film Comedian Razak Khan passed away

RT News Service

Imphal June 1: Film Comedian Razak Khan, who worked in films like "Hera Pheri", "Raja Hindustani" and "Baadshah" among others, died today following a cardiac arrest.

Khan, 65, was rushed to Holy Family hospital in suburban Bandra at around 12.30 AM where on arrival doctors declared him dead.

His funeral is likely to be held tomorrow at the Narialwadi Kabaristan at Byculla in the city.

NPF endorses suspension orders
DIMAPUR, JUN 1 (NPN) Published on 2 Jun. 2016 12:42 AM IST
NPF Legislature Party spokesperson, Yitachu has stated that the party during its joint meeting on Wednesday resolved to fully endorse the suspension of Lok Sabha MP, Neiphiu Rio and MLA Imkong L. Imchen from the party’s primary and active membership till further orders.
The joint meeting was held with the NPF legislators holding offices and senior party functionaries of the NPF.
Yitachu said that the house also resolved to fully endorse the decision of the party’s Disciplinary Action Committee and the subsequent orders issued its president Dr Shurhozelie in serving suspension orders.
“We are of the considered opinion that the decision was taken in the best interest of the party and also to ensure the stability of the NPF-led DAN government,” Yitachu said.
The house also reaffirmed its unflinching support to the leadership of NPF president Dr Shurhozelie Liezietsu and the chief minister T.R Zeliang.
Yitachu said all the members present at the meeting also reiterated its support to the peace talks, to work out for an early and permanent settlement acceptable and honourable to all.
Issues should be raised in an appropriate forum: Peseyie
Breaking his silence over the imbroglio concerning the NPF party, Parliamentary Affairs minister, Kiyanielie Peseyie said any kind of issue needed to be raised in an appropriate forum.
In a press note, referring to the statements reportedly made by suspended NPF members, that their demand for change of leadership within the party cannot be termed or considered as anti-party activities, Peseyie said if such was the case, it should have been made “within the four walls of appropriate party forum-- CEC, or NPF parliamentary party, as and when the party makes such notifications, and not in public forum, or through the media”.
Elaborating on the way how political parties project or choose a chief minister during and after the elections, Peseyie said “when a duly elected leader is at the helm of affairs, repeated attempts to de-stabilize the party-led government and also attempts made on several occasions to divide the party set-up by organizing concentration-like camps for the dissatisfied party MLAs etc., can only be termed and considered as anti-party activity”.
However, if anyone still demands a change of guard, outside the party forum, he said the only platform was to seek for a floor test in the House. Such was the case on February 5, 2015 when all 59 legislators voted in favour of the confidence motion moved by the chief minister, he said while also referring to Supreme Court’s ruling in the SR Bommai case.
Reminding that all political parties are governed by its constitution and the governments run under the ambit of law and the Constitution of India, Peseyie said no legislator or party functionary was above the law and the constitution.
As practiced, he said “if anyone crosses the limits, show cause notices are served to them, and if replies or/clarifications are satisfactory, or apologies made for misdeeds, there are always provisions and ways and means for reconsideration”.
However, the Parliamentary Affairs minister said “if anyone openly challenges the established party system, the only option left for the party leadership is to take disciplinary action”.
He also pointed out that such actions were not to be taken to the public domain for debate and discussion in the marketplace, saying “such an action, in itself, is an anti-party activity”.
On the issue of dissidence within the NPF, which he was created by some people, the reconciliation had taken place way back in April 2015.
“But surprisingly, campaigning for change of leadership in the government and the party continued unabated, all outside the four walls of the party forum”, he added.
“…If such activities are not to be considered as anti-party activities, what action can be termed as anti-party activity?” he wondered.
Referring to the directive issued to all NPF legislators with regard to their movement, Peseyie said this was done in order to “curb unnecessary expenditure due to uncontrolled movement of ministers, advisors and parliamentary secretaries both within and outside the state, and to ensure discipline so that they do not go out of station for trivial matters”.
Refuting the suspended members’ statement, he said this directive in no way could be termed as autocratic and dictatorial.
Such practices were procedural for proper functioning of the government, Peseyie stated adding even the Governors are required to avail prior permission of the President as and when they go out of their states.
***KHOCHUNGTE AWGIN***

Miss. Veineinem Singson wept at Sangga mon INN CCpur

Tah chanu Miss: Veineinem Singson in ccpur a D.phailien vangkho, Basanphai veng avisit pet a lim nal tah a aki post pet , member ho likes ijat na pih diu ham????

LHAGAO GA - SPIRITUAL FRUIT

TUNI LHAGAO ANPHAA

(Thursday, 02/06/2016)

--------------------------

Galatia 5:25

"Eiho Lhagaova hinga ihiule lhagao in chonu hite"

Theiphung chu akiphu tengle apet pet in aga jeng poi. Hijongle vanna kon a gotui le nisa ho amu a kon a energy achan a jal in ahung khanglen jin chutengle ahung ga doh jin ahi.

Hitobang chun lhagao a hinna nei (Mipengthah) khat jong chu alhagao hinkho hung pilhing deu deu intin chule Lhagao a hung gadoh teiji ahi.

Solchah Paul in Galatia houbung mite henga chun Lhagao ga 10 ahil in ahi. Hiche ho chu-

1. Ngailut - Christa ngailutna salvah ding

2. Kipa - Tonsot thina a kon a huhdoh hina jeh a halna nei ding

3. Cham - Christa toh ikicham chu mijouse anga photchet ding

4. Lungmon - Asunga Pakai Lhagao chen jeh a lungmon ding

5. Thohhat - Christa dia hing ihitah jeh a hahsatna jouse thohhat ding

6. Mihepi - Pakai mihepina ichan banga mijouse hepi suoh kei ding

7. Phat - Aphatah Lhagao toh hingkhom ihijeh a phat jing ding

8. Tahsan umtah - Mi tahsan theimi hi ding

9. Lungneng - Pakai lungde hat vanga hinna chang ihijeh a lungneng put ngai

10. Kitim them - Eima dinga hing ihi tah lou jeh a chu imajouse a kitim them ngai ahi.

TILKHOUNA:

# Ahile nangle kei Lhagao a hing (Mipengthah sa) ihile idinmun chu itobang hinam?

# Lhagao a gadoh ihi hinam? Ole tahsa lam ngaichat joh a gadoh jing ihi nahlai ham?

# Ole theiphung gatheilou banga chu nangle keijong khangtou theilou/ gadoh theilou lhagao hinkho inei khah ham?

# Ijemtia Lhagao a ga theilou ihi khah le kikhuol phat angaije. Lhagao an neh le don lhahsam jeh ham? Ole lhagao gamsat jeh leh tolgot jeh ham?

# Pakai Jesu Christan keija naum uva ahile haga a nagadoh diu ahi ati- John 15:1-8.

# Theiphung / muchi chu itu teng aga ding ikinep banga chu eiho jong Lhagao a igadoh diu chu Pakai deisah ahi.

Phattheina jouse hungkon dohna Van le Lei Pathen in Christa a ium jinguva haga a igadoh jing theina diuvin ibon chauvin athahbeh in phatthei eibuoh suoh kei kit tauhen.

Kakipah E!

------------------------------

✍PK Gogou Kipgen

📲☎

: 8124503398

------------------------------

© Khochungte Awgin

Gospel For India Founder (L) Rev. Zamlal Vaiphei damlai CHANCHIN CHAWMKIM (1948-2015)

GOSPEL FOR INDIA FOUNDER (L) REV. ZAMLAL VAIPHEI (1948-2015) DAMLAI HINKHUA CHANCHIN CHAWMKIM

Nilaini, June 1, 2016:

Rev. Zamlal hi Pathian nasep hi akhawk sak ma² in GFI ala phutdawk hi. GFI bang ahi em iti ahi chun “Gospel for India” kiti ahi. Zia hi eipau thawlo kol le vai (mainland Indian) haw kiang ah Pathian thucha tut ahi. Adamlai hun ahin Pathian adingin ala kipe dawk in Sepai camp umna chuam² visit bawl in kikhawpna te haw ala khawksak ma² in, India kulpi kiang chun Home Minister kiang in Sepai camp umna zosia’n kikhop theina biak Inn umdin ti’n Memorandum ala pia hial hi. Ama hi mi kiphal ma² ahia, Pathian lalgam keklian nadi’n pan nasatak ala’n GFI hi ahun phutdawk hi. Tuhi’n Pathian ala helo hial gingtu thak mi 55 vel in Baptisma chang sak ahitai.  Tuni tiang in Labu hoitak Hindi lâzik edition ni (2) ala suadawk man ah. Eidition Khatna chu Delhi khopi ah Dr. HT Sangliana Vice Chairperson Minority Commission, Government of India in ala release hi, Anina 2nd Edition chu Dr. Th. Lamboi in ala release bawk hi.

Gospel For India hi IEM, EFI chun ECCI hetpina (affiliated) ahi. Manipur gam mei² hilo gamdang natiang ale missionary nasep na aum hi. GFI hin Children Ministry, Evangelism chun House visit ti haw na asem sek uh ahi.

Tuni tiang in GFI executive board mi 9 anei ua, advisory board mi 4 tawh kithua in Pastor le Evangelist haw kithua in Lamka khopi sung ah Pathian thugen na asem uh ahi. GFI hi 2001 akhan aki register ahitai. (Regd. No. 32/2001). Tuni tiang in Pathian hepi nazal in GFI in Hindi Service chun Prayer meeting chuleh Children Ministry asem zing ua. Office le kikhawp na chu ahile Churachandpur Govt. College mai tak ama building asawng chungnung pen aum in, Kikhawpna le zia tak mun ma asaw aum hi.

OFFICE BEARER:

Chairman: N Nangkhanlal

Secretary: Rev. Khuala

Contact Number: +91 96125 55502

Email: goingbeyondborder@gmail.com

Facebook: Gospel For India (GFI)

WhatsApp Number: +91 9862079412

Lamka khopi sungah field working staff te chu:

1.       Pastor N Pauliankap
2.       Evan. Prakash Sharma
3.       Evan. Ceroline
4.       Evan. Haukhopau,
5.       Evan. Kimzaniang
6.       Evan. Kikim
7.       Evan. Thanglianpu 

Service le Timing

          I.        Hindi Service : Every Sunday Time: 1 pm

         II.       Prayer Meeting: Every Saturday 8 am

        III.      Children Ministry chu zinglam 11 le umsek ahi.

CHANCHIN CHAWMKIM:

                I sun tak uh Rev. Zamlal Vaiphei hi ala Famta Pa. Letkhopau leh Nu Hoiting chate 9 lak ah a panina ahia, Kum 1948, April 5^th in Thingkeu khua’n ala piang hi. 1974 in Nu. Zaching taw ala kicheng ua, Thagau lam dinmun in Kum 1978 Good Friday nin Evan. Chungthang Thiek Crusade nan Thingkeu khuan ala Piangthak hi. 

Chale nau laigil ah ga malzawlna a dawn teu zia a nuai’a gual hi ahi.

1                1. Pa Paukhanlun @ Lulun H/o Capt. Nianghau

                  2. Nu Dimthianngai @ Rose Mary W/o Rev. Dr. Haulianthang Los Angeles USA

                 3. Nu Tingneiniang @ Niangboi W/o Dr. Rajiv Raju, Scotland

                 4. Nu Chingkhanmuan W/o Mr. Zolian Vaiphei of Lingsiphai

Apiana Nule Pa damtalo maleu a suapite cheng anuai’ah gual hi ahiu.

               a) Mr. Soitinkhom

               b) Rev. Zamlal

               c) Mrs. Nemneilam

               d) Mrs. Lamzaniang

               e) Mrs. Ngaikim

               f) Upa. Kaikhokam

               g) Mrs. Chinneihoi

               h) (L) Mr. Kamzathang

               i) Mrs. Kimneiman @ Tawinu

 

Khovel ah adamlai in ala khawsak dan chanchin neukhat:

Ø  Thingtang gam Thingkeu khua ala cheng, launa sem.
Ø  Thinglei hun bawl in, Lamka khopi lam hun pem
Ø  Pharmacy Business hun bawl
Ø  LIC agent hi in NE ading ah AWARD sangpen ala sang
Ø  Khovel hausakna del talo in, Pathian na sem ding ah ala kipia
Ø  Hill Town EOC kochuam ah hun sawt tak Local Chairman ala tu
Ø  ECCI ah Missionary Chairman hun sawt tak ala tu
Ø  A damlai in New Life Ministry ah board member hizing
Ø  GFI ala phutdawk
Ø  EOC kochuam apat Reverend ordained ala hi.

 Missionary nasep na taw kisai in a khualzin vel vel lai in zia taksa natna dawi umlo tak hi 2013 vel apat in ahuntak suata, 2014 August tha apat Investigation kibawl in 07^th Oct, 2014 in Mumbai Tata Memorial Cancer Institute in anu taw vaki admit in, 05^th December 2014 in operation nei thei in ahung um hi. January 1, 2015 in inlam a hung kile kit tau. Zia chun Radiotherapy RIMS imphal ah ni 30 bawlzaw 2015 May tarik 4 in Mumbai ah Checkup dingah chia in, May 18^th 2015 in a hung kile kit tau.

                -Thathum dan ah Checkup zelding ti a hia September 2015 a ding in le ticket a lazo mantai-

A hin Imphal a Dr. L. Jaichan (RIMS) in Hospital ah admit ding advise a bawl ziak in May 31 2015 zingkal in RIMS ah Special ward ah admit a hia, taksa damna ding’a a ngaina Hospital ah admit ahi lai in, Lalpa’n ama zia Khawvel haksatna, kana gam ah umding phal talo in tarik 01-06-2015 (Thawtanni) sun dak 01:40 pm in ama kiang’ah ala chawldam tai.

© Khochungte Awgin